하워드 막스 회장 | 트럼프 관세 해설 – YouTube Dictation Transcript & Vocabulary
Selamat datang di FluentDictation—situs diktasi YouTube terbaik untuk belajar bahasa Inggris. Kuasai video level B1 ini dengan transkrip interaktif dan alat shadowing kami. Kami telah membagi "하워드 막스 회장 | 트럼프 관세 해설" menjadi segmen pendek, sempurna untuk latihan diktasi dan peningkatan pelafalan. Baca transkrip beranotasi, pelajari kosakata penting, dan tingkatkan kemampuan mendengarkan Anda. 👉 Mulai Diktasi
Bergabunglah dengan ribuan pelajar yang menggunakan alat diktasi YouTube kami untuk meningkatkan kemampuan mendengar dan menulis bahasa Inggris.

📺 Click to play this educational video. Best viewed with captions enabled for dictation practice.
Transkrip & Sorotan Interaktif
1.and you know this is this is the biggest change in the environment that I've seen probably in my career Uh you know we went we've gone from uh free trade and or world trade and globalization uh to this uh system which uh implies uh significant restrictions on trade in every direction uh and a step toward isolation uh for the United States Howard you wrote that a month ago The world has changed We have seen the markets sell off We have seen tariffs implemented that are the highest levels that we've seen going back a hundred years Does your thesis still hold um the yields on credit are still very healthy and in fact credit yields a little more now than it did uh six weeks ago when I wrote that memo Then high yield bonds for example were yielding around 7.2 Today they're close to eight which means they went down in price producing a a higher return Of course the stock market is well down since then I don't know 16 15 16 17% I haven't done the math yet and it keeps moving but um you know obviously the the state of the world which equity prices depend on is in flux and uh has been changed Most investors think for the worse That's why prices are down The question of course is whether they're down too much just right or or not enough And and and uh almost nobody can say How do you start to even measure something like a potential paradigm shift like the tariffs that were earlier this week well first of all of course measure is the wrong word because you that suggests some quantification which is impossible There's nothing to measure But how do you gauge how do you think about the changes and you know this is this is the biggest change in the environment that I've seen probably in my career uh you know we went we've gone from uh free trade and or world trade and globalization uh to this uh system which uh implies uh significant restrictions on trade in every direction uh and a step toward isolation uh for the United States I believe that the last 80 years since World War II have been the best economic period in the history of mankind Uh and one of the major reasons was the the growth of trade and I think that we have truly had a rising tide that lifted all boats and and trade was a big part of that and everybody in the audience should understand the role of of trade Every country for example does some things better and worse And welfare is maximized when every country does the things it does best and cheapest and then sells them to the countries that need them which do other things and sell them to other people That's how trade works And uh well I don't know if it's correct but the good news is that the Italians make the pasta and the Swiss make the watches But if we stop world trade and and the Swiss have to make their own pasta and the Italians have to make their own watches the world will probably be well maybe arguably people in both countries will be a little worse off That's what we're talking about here and and and uh we should not the benefits that we've gotten from globalization And among other things there was a 25-y year period which I cited in one of my memos 10 years ago in which the the the cost of durables in the US went down by 40% in in in in uh risk in in inflation adjusted terms that kept a lid on inflation here It made goods cheaply to all Americans If we don't have world trade we don't have that benefit And you know the the tariffs are designed to encourage production at home But who could imagine that uh that most things produced in the United States will be as cheap as they are coming from abroad in other words things will cost more If that's the case does that mean that you see the inflationary regime as being something that is more persistent a reversal of what we saw the of the globalization well I think so There were financial benefits from globalization including keeping a lid on inflation And you know if if we hadn't bought our uh TV sets and appliances from abroad in that 25- year period at declining prices what would inflation have been and the answer is considerably more Maybe not two but maybe three four five And so you know tariffs are an increased cost Somebody has to pay them And uh you know most people think the consumer will pay them There's some possibility that the importer or the exporter will pay them or the government of the exporting country Uh but uh it's an increased cost Uh the proceeds from which will go to the government and you know will society be better off as a result when you're measuring how to decide the risk and reward of given asset classes in this type of environment they could go in a multitude of different ways How do you understand where there's value what a return is that would justify a risk at a time when you know potentially you could get 7 8% 9% with credit with stocks they have delivered more than 10% for the past number of decades But going forward I want to respond first to your last sentence Stocks have uh delivered an average of 10% a year for the last h 100red years but not when the PE ratio was 19 and the PE ratio today is probably 19 The average return has been 16 So we can say that when the PE average average when the PE ratio averages 16 the return average is 10 But when the PE ratio is 19 my guess is if you look at history if you bought the P the S&P when the PE ratio is 19 historically you probably made let's say 1 to 6% a year or 2 to 7% a year something like that but certainly not 10 And and so uh you know what you pay matters and the price of the S&P is elevated relative to historic levels So you shouldn't expect historic returns Whereas in credit one of your arguments is you can expect to get that return because the default risk isn't as great as some of the excess spreads and what you're getting in allin yield Well you know with with credit is a a new fangled word for fixed income or which was a new fangled word for bonds In 1978 uh I was moved at City Bank from the equities department to the bond department Nobody talked about fixed income or credit But um with debt or bonds or fixed income or credit what you see is what you get You you can read on the piece of paper what the promised return is And then the only thing you have to wonder about is will I get it that is to say will the issuer default or will they keep their promises and by the way they promise you interest They promise you to pay your money back at the end And then if they don't keep the promise they lose the company So they have a lot of incentives to pay I've been in in non-investment grade credit for 47 years And in our experience roughly 99% of our issuers have paid as promised You've thrived during your five decade career almost five decade career uh during times of dislocation Is this a time of dislocation to play or not to well it's it's a time of dislocation Everybody has to judge for themselves whether the the reduction in asset prices so far is right inadequate or excessive If it's excessive you should jump in with both feet If it's inadequate you should wait until things adjust further Um and it's impossible to make that judgment qualitatively You used the word measure before I pushed back a little bit There's there's no place you can look There's no analysis you can do to determine whether today's asset prices are right for the environment ahead Now there never is It's always conjecture It's always guesswork That's in theory why the greatest investors are great because they make those judgments better than most people It's excessively hard today because today we have no idea what the future's going to be Normally we think we know what's going to happen in the future We normally assume the future will look mostly like the past We extrapolate and usually it works because the world doesn't change that much But the the world economy and the world order beyond economy meaning geopolitics and international relationships has been shook up like a snow globe by the events of the last days And nobody knows what it's going to look like Um nobody knows I I dare say if you tell me that you what the what the what our rules will be six months ago six months from now I'll bet you you're wrong This is in flux And if you think it's in flux then by definition you don't know what the future holds And then even if you know what our country is going to do and it's going to be that way six months from now we don't know what other countries are going to do what the ramifications will be Um and so you know um I always invey against forecasting I don't believe in macro forecasting my own or other people's and we know much less today than usual Now people who who like to run their lives according to forecasts they say well this is going to happen in the future so I'm going to do this and this is going to happen in the future so I'm going to do that What what you really need if you like to work with forecast is you need two things Not just a forecast you need the forecast but you need a an estimate of the probability that your forecast is correct And today whatever your forecast may be you have to say the probability that I'm right is lower than ever because the probability that we know what the future's going to look like is lower than ever And that's that's how I feel Is this a time to be fearful or greedy [Music] um you know what you have to say bloomberg's offices Uh you have to think in terms of your neighbor Um uh the department store Bloomingdales Bloomingdales Bloomingdales just put everything on sale Prices have come down on for the S&P uh 8% in the last two days and uh much more in the last six weeks It's on sale That should encourage people to think about buying Will they go down further nobody knows Will are the prices fair nobody knows But everybody runs from the market when prices go down because they think it conotes risk It's just stuff going on sale And of course it takes uh well I was going to say a pro but it takes a precient pro of which there aren't many to know whether as I keep saying the the the discounts are adequate or appropriate But certainly you have to look and and and it doesn't make any sense to say just a minute I did XYZ when the price was 100 today the price is 90 so I'm going to boycott it That doesn't make any sense on its face You have to take a hard look Do you still think that the US is the best place to invest it's I I think it's probably still the best place but it's less best than it used to be because I think that um you know uh if you think about the things that made it the best place uh one of them was the rule of law that may be less the fact today One of them was the predictability of outcomes that may be less today One of them was the uh well the worst thing about investing in the United States for many years has been our fiscal situation our deficits and debts and the US has behaved like somebody who has a golden credit card where there's no credit limit and the bill never comes So of course you can spend more than you make and that's and if somebody has a golden credit card uh well what would you do well you might buy a nice car but what the hell you might as well buy all the cars because the bill's not going to come And that's the way we've behaved Uh and and that's the way Washington has spent money But can the events of the recent days change that can they cause there to be a credit limit can they cause a bill to be presented at some point in time and if the answer to either or both of those is yes that's a real risk If people don't like the dollar don't like investing in the United States u don't want to hold an unlimited number of treasuries if we just make people mad and say the US is still a great credit but I don't want to hold their debts because look how they're treating me The fiscal situation will be very complicated Howard Marks We have to leave it there
💡 Tap the highlighted words to see definitions and examples
Kosakata Kunci (CEFR B1)
prospective
B1The scene before or around, in time or in space; view; prospect.
Example:
"price producing a a higher prospective"
completely
A2(manner) In a complete manner
Example:
"completely in flux and uh has been"
radically
A2In a radical manner; fundamentally; very.
Example:
"radically changed Most investors think"
questions
A2A sentence, phrase or word which asks for information, reply or response; an interrogative.
Example:
"questions is yes that's a real risk If"
announced
A2To give public notice, especially for the first time; to make known
Example:
"announced earlier this week"
worldwide
A2Spanning the world; global.
Example:
"worldwide welfare is maximized when"
politically
B1In a political manner
Example:
"well I don't know if it's politically"
underestimate
B1An estimate that is too low.
Example:
"underestimate the benefits that we've"
available
A2Such as one may avail oneself of; capable of being used for the accomplishment of a purpose.
Example:
"inflation here It made goods available"
disinflation
B2A decrease in the inflation rate.
Example:
"reversal of what we saw the disinflation"
Kata | CEFR | Definisi |
---|---|---|
prospective | B1 | The scene before or around, in time or in space; view; prospect. |
completely | A2 | (manner) In a complete manner |
radically | A2 | In a radical manner; fundamentally; very. |
questions | A2 | A sentence, phrase or word which asks for information, reply or response; an interrogative. |
announced | A2 | To give public notice, especially for the first time; to make known |
worldwide | A2 | Spanning the world; global. |
politically | B1 | In a political manner |
underestimate | B1 | An estimate that is too low. |
available | A2 | Such as one may avail oneself of; capable of being used for the accomplishment of a purpose. |
disinflation | B2 | A decrease in the inflation rate. |
Ingin lebih banyak latihan diktasi YouTube? Kunjungi pusat latihan.
Ingin menerjemahkan beberapa bahasa sekaligus? KunjungiWant to translate multiple languages at once? Visit our Penerjemah Multi Bahasa.
Tips Tata Bahasa & Pelafalan untuk Diktasi
Chunking
Perhatikan jeda pembicara setelah frasa untuk membantu pemahaman.
Linking
Dengarkan pengucapan terhubung saat kata-kata menyatu.
Intonation
Perhatikan perubahan intonasi yang menonjolkan informasi penting.
Analisis Kesulitan & Statistik Video
Materi Diktasi yang Dapat Diunduh
Download Study Materials
Download these resources to practice offline. The transcript helps with reading comprehension, SRT subtitles work with video players, and the vocabulary list is perfect for flashcard apps.
Ready to practice?
Start your dictation practice now with this video and improve your English listening skills.